Your Opinion

Home Letters To The Editor Wally Erb responds to VBTA candidate endorsements

Now that Virginia Beach has forged into an urbanization mode, it can't be undone. Flexibility and consideration to meet the ever growing demands of core services must be balanced with increased revenue streams. It is a fact of life.  The thrust of urbanization is not known to be an economy of scale, but advocates the need for new and accommodating solutions. Moss and DeSteph’s Spartan approach may sound appealing to the uninformed but this standstill mentality  fails to look ahead and mitigate unknown economic permutations.

The only austerity that I advocate is that of the lawful conduct of our local government business. The completeness of recorded correspondence is sketchy at best, where germane documentation, whether hard copy or electronic, escape the archives through negligent routing to the recording custodian. City Council is notorious, as is the City Manager, of failing to route all city business for archival and inclusion on the custodian’s index.

The “Conservative Coalition” city council candidates are attempting to overcome well funded incumbents with insufficient funds to prevail in a traditional campaign.  I would purport that unless one can come up with six digits they are wasting anything less. The nominal contributions given to a candidate are often squandered on over bought brochures, obnoxious signage placed in the public right-of-way, and funding entrance fees to festive merry-making political events

To prevail in this climate take thinking out of the box, and expending as little as possible. On the cusp of a new age of electioneering, signs, mailings, and brochure distribution are expenses that are unnecessary with the access to the voter through social networks, internet websites, Youtube productions, emailing, and cell phone text messages.

Out of the 3 mayoral candidates I am the only one that promises to seek assistance during the General Assembly sessions with a physical presence; unencumbered financially, and devoid of employment or business interests, I have the time to maintain regular Mayor’s office hours offering an open government, open door policy.

I wouldn't put much credence in the on-line poll. In the effort to skew the result, ardent supporters vote multiple times. By using diverse browsers, several user names, and most popularly clearing their "cookies", this deceptive practice is prevalent in on-line polls. Also,  a candidate was advertising with a link to vote for one of the other. The only poll that counts is the one on Nov 6th.  What ever derogatory remarks or suppositions are directed at me makes no difference. I’m in it to the end. Deal with it.

Wally Erb - wallyformayor.com

Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments
Add New
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Ben Krause  - Disappointed |71.54.142.151 |10-01-2012 18:34:33
Wally, I am very disappointed in you. You used to be a conservative. It appears that you have not be gettin yoour way and now, like a spoiled child, are striking out against your old friends. Either that or you need to change your tobacco. What you really should do is pray about this.
l.
Rick Saylers |74.98.191.182 |10-02-2012 08:43:56
Ben I agree with you. This isn't the Wally of old. He seems bitter. Hell bent on destroying the city's only chance of dumping Mayor Sessoms. I bet Sessoms is paying Wally to be a spoiler. If that isn't the case then Wally is delusional and going through a mid-life mental crisis. He's pathetic.
Brenda Martinson |74.98.191.182 |10-02-2012 08:48:17
Wally is worse than pathetic. Have you seen how he dresses? That stupid looking straw hat, suspenders, and tennis shoes? Then he walks like a penguin with his feet flopped out to the side. Yeah, he's the kind of turncoat I want to watch throw the election.
Wally Erb  - Attire |68.10.230.99 |10-04-2012 10:25:15
Physical appearance seems to be a thing to Brenda. Very shallow. Irrespective, if I was the only challenger in the race, you would vote for me, wouldn't you. For that matter, you would probably vote for Obama over Sessoms.
Brenda Martinson |74.98.191.182 |10-04-2012 14:42:32
Wally you should have more respect for the office and the people you are trying to impress than to dress like a little 'mafia' soldier.
Wally Erb  - Mid-life? |68.10.230.99 |10-04-2012 10:19:02
Wow, does that mean my life expectancy is 134 years? Maybe I should revise my thoughts on term limits. I'll take that bet. With three retirements, debt free, and a 7 digit portfolio, I don't need any pocket jingle.
Wally Erb  - Conservative |68.10.230.99 |10-04-2012 10:36:05
Ben: Are you serious? You would vote for more beachfront interest and a developer on council? Someone whose statements make promises, with less than a 10% voting power on council, cannot assure delivery? And I am not striking out against old friends. If true friends do not agree politically, they don't sever their personal relationship and respect their friend's opinion. Now that is something worth praying about!
Anonymous |74.98.191.182 |10-04-2012 09:00:08
Wally, the reference to your mid-life crisis deals with your spastic mentality and inexplicable vindictiveness in deliberately sandbagging the opportunity to overthrow Sessoms. If RK dropped out you wouldn't stand a chance - you know it and you're dead set out of personal vindictiveness against RK to cost the citizens of Virginia Beach the election. And you will remain a political pariah among your former friends. Get out now and all will be forgiven.
Wally Erb  - Guess you don't get yet. |68.10.230.99 |10-04-2012 23:39:40
Sorry. You are free to think whatever you care. I have given a specifically unique platform in this race. I fail to trade a banker with developer interests for a developer with beachfront interest, and in my opinion, a questionable past and possible future. Further, you think your revolutionary group will rally enough of a dissenting vote to unseat the incumbent. That is all RK has put on the table. You are not interested in selecting the best qualified for the office, whether it be me or not, but a vindictive demeanor to replace the incumbent. In my mind, because I stand on principle, I seek no forgiveness from "former friends" because if you were friends, there would be nothing to forgive.
Brenda |74.98.191.182 |10-05-2012 07:20:58
Wally, I think your responses are proving what others are saying, You are delusional. Your mind/logic is spastic. You have no resources. You have no base. You have no principle. You are just a bitter old man hell bent on destruction of Virginia Beach.
Vicki M  - Brenda - Pot calling the kettle. |71.51.5.18 |10-05-2012 07:51:53
Your comments here have no substance at all are the ones that are bitter. You are not responding to Wally in any sort of intelligent manner. He doesnt support Sessoms and I don't blame him for not supporting RK. Who, BTW, isn't exactly "attractive" now is he. One of you need to advise him to remove the photos from his page because he looks totally STONED or intoxicated half the time.

Just because people don't agree with YOU does not mean their logic is spastic. Get a grip woman.
Anonymous |74.98.191.182 |10-05-2012 09:35:46
If he doesn't support RK, he supports Sessoms. I think he's just peeved that RK is getting noticeable support from the conservatives and he isn't. I think he's allowing a personal feud to support Sessoms at all costs and trashing RK, admittedly not the best candidate for the job, but more resourceful than Wally. He's turned off the whole conservative establishment.
Vicki M  - Stupid little forum of 2-3 people |74.98.191.182 |10-06-2012 01:54:54
Alright Robert and Brenda/Anonymous/Rick Saylers - (hint: you give yourself away as you have the same exact IP address in each post, dummy.)

The opinions of less than a handful of angry vindictive LINO's have no impact. And by LINO I mean those who regard someone as a political (and personal) enemy if you dont jump on the bandwagon by supporting each & every single viewpoint.

What happened to freedom and voluntary association w/out intimidation? Seems to me you LINO's are the most hypocritical of all, touting one republican over another.

This is why i will never label myself as member of any 'one' party, I choose to think for myself.

You CANNOT speak for others, force anyone to withdraw nor define what a vote against RK equates to.

Toodles.
Vicki M  - What's "pathetic" is this forum. |71.51.5.18 |10-05-2012 07:36:47
All you can do is resort to personal insult and ridiculous comments on appearance rather than anything of substance? (Especially you, Ms. Martinson, you have NO. CLASS. WHATSOEVER.)

Sounds to me as if you're the ones that are bitter. Don't most of you consider yourselves 'libertarian'? I would say LINO's is more like it.

RK has certainly not demonstrated himself to be the model citizen and has done nothing in the form of civic involvement other than issues related to the oceanfront. Wally on the other hand has been involved for DECADES. How is he striking out at his old so-called "friends"? Because he offers voters a 3rd option?

Would you all consider Goode, Johnson, and Stein (heck and even Paul in the past) "Spoilers?"

Get over it. Your juvenile comments on this piddly, rarely viewed website don't matter and won't change a thing.
Brenda |74.98.191.182 |10-05-2012 09:39:18
Mz. Vicki: Yes I considered Goode spoiler because he has some conservative credentials. Johnson, Stein, and Ron were just losers. Although Ron brought great intellect on policy issues to the forefront, he just could not generate substantial support. No Wally is striking out because he has nothing else to do except support Sessoms and trash any hope of kicking his ass out.
Anonymous  - Leon |70.160.218.4 |10-07-2012 15:32:24
Brenda,
I think your remarks about Wally's attire are childish and bitter.
I have found that as the years pass I am less likely to trust someone in a suit. Afterall, you know that old saying about polishing turds...
Wally has substance and can be trusted.
You should be paying attention to what people stand for and their actions instead well-scripted words and fancy suits.