McDonald, hiding behind rhetoric that she's serving the taxpayers' best interests through her interpretations and aggressive actions, has proved inflexible at best.

It has been implied that after  several businesses raised BPOL tax issues, that McDonald ordered retaliatory audits of several of the businesses the following week.

In 2007 her attempt to assess a wholesale tax on petroleum dealers, already taxed separately for the same product, was overturned by the General Assembly.

Drake said, "To our knowledge, McDonald is the only constitutional officer whose efforts to impose such a tax have been overturned by a member of his/her own party, namely Senator Dick Saslaw, now the Senate Majority Leader."

A 2003 attempt to assess a $50 fee on artists at the Stockley Garden Art Fair had to be stopped by the Norfolk City Council.
And its alleged her staff 'investigations' of scofflaw garage sales costs the city more than they produce in revenue.

McDonald does cite numerous improvements she's made to the office and policies making it easier for citizens to obtain various permits.

Knack also has the support of the Retail Merchants Association and numerous businesses.  He has raise more than twice in campaign funds what McDonald has.

He's banking on the growing dissatisfaction of businesses and unpopularity for her tactics to help him win the office.
Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments
Add New
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Archie R. Whitehill  - Makes no sense to me . . . . |71.241.6.199 |10-19-2009 13:38:11
I am on the Knack e-mail list and all he remarks on is his perception that his wife's business was unfairly taxed. This has apparently been going on for years. Think a moment. The alleged "injustice" happened years ago and it still goes on? Apparently there is no foundation to the complaints by the state. The state, where it really counts. Who cares what the business universe thinks? No one feels their taxes are just, although they feel everyone else's are just and proper. Is the aforementioned business still being taxed in spite of dragings through the courts? That tells me it was a legal tax.

Interpretation to the strict sense is the way laws ought to be enforced. Anything less is favoriteism. My conclusion is that if Knack were to become Commissioner of the Revenue, among his first actions would be to offer tax relief specifically to his wife. Sure, other businesses may benefit, although it seems not since her business appears to be unique.

Do we want...
sallie Page  - Read on |205.188.116.5 |10-24-2009 21:44:15
It is a sad but simple fact that people blieve what they want to believe. If Mr. . would simply read the facts before reaching a conclusion, he would see that the state has ruled AGAINST the commissioner, the commissioner is not an advocate for business and she needs to be replaced. A little further digging would reveal that nack's wife HAS filed an appeal to the commissioner and has been ignored. This is far more than a one isue campaign.