Lots of Questions, Few Answers!

Please click on the You tube video here:

for an entertaining discussion of the massive movements of military hardware all over this nation.

I’m a simple man with relatively low expectations of the effectiveness of our federal government both domestically and in foreign operating theaters; but, here’s a few questions for you to ponder:

1. Why are all our domestic military bases still on Force Protection Condition “Bravo?” The increased awareness was set for a reason. What was that reason and why are we still at “Bravo.” Yes, sniper teams are still on the most advantageous roof tops on local bases. The shooting incident at the AFB at Little Rock has been given scant MSM attention as has the FBI warning this week that an attack was eminent in Philly. There has been almost no coverage of the Philly warning. Why?

2. How is it that the Director of the FBI admitted to members of the press that the Bureau had the principle shooter at Waco under active surveillance the week before the Waco shooting but the jihadist(s) slipped out of AZ and drove to TX undetected? Why did the FBI and US Marshalls NOT PROVIDE protection for Pamela Geller, the Waco free speech event organizer, immediately after the shooting? Why was mosque frequented the Waco jihadists in Phoenix not raided immediately after the shots rang out in Waco?

3. The shooter in Charleston was all jacked-up on psychotropic drugs that have been used by our Christians In Action (CIA) boys for years to bend the minds of young men who are identified as easy prey for the psyops folks. The kid had been reported to the cops as a potential problem. Why was nobody following-up on the complaint, especially in light of what testimony the shooter’s friends have given of the shooters state of mind? In light of Ferguson and Baltimore, you would think that kids with guns railing against our black citizens might spark more than passing interest from law enforcement types, wouldn’t you? Did somebody at HQ call-off any further investigation? If they did, were they inviting the type of slaughter that we saw in Charleston? The authorities allowed Ferguson to burn and the Baltimore mayor gave rioters “room to destroy,” if it so far-fetched to believe that a nut case would be allowed to roam around the country looking for targets? Is it too far-fetched to think that the shooter was programmed to do just that?

4. Why is the national MSM so ready to condemn racial tensions and white privilege in the Charleston shooting, but a jihadist can mount a table top in Fort Hood, shout “Allahu Akbar” and kill 13 of our Army’s finest and nobody condemns Muslim jihadists? Why is the human / animal hybrid, Major Nidal Hasan, still breathing American air going on six years since the assassinations? Why has Obama not given orders to hang the animal? Is my allegation that Obama intends to package Hasan, the Blind Sheik and Tsarnaev into a three-for-one hostage trade in the final hour of his term becoming more and more plausible?

5. How can the US President be so ready to condemn our Second Amendment rights in the hours after the Charleston shooting and yet not order a synchronized, nation-wide raid on all the mosques in the USA, knowing 85% of them have pro-jihad reading material on their shelves? Please define “pro-jihad” as “anti-American.”

6. How is the USA so capable of coordinating the movement of thousands of pieces of equipment all over this country for “Jade Helm 15″ and yet Obama is incapable of listening to his Air Force generals and ordering sufficient Forward Air Controllers to Iraq to “paint” ISIS targets for all the jets, 75% of which are returning to base with all those nifty smart bombs securely in the bomb bays? Who runs a war like that? Maybe a Commander in Chief who was chiefly responsible for creating ISIS in the first place and doesn’t want to see his Middle East destabilizing force destroyed? The effectiveness of sophisticated jets is relatively easy to control, just put blinders on the weapons systems!

Ask some of your smart friends if they can answer some of these questions with sound logic. If they can’t provide any answers, ask them to ask their smart friends. Sooner or later, some smart guy or gal is going to send this email back to me with all my dumb questions answered logically. So far, logic seems to be in scarce supply.

Pataki “Gets it.” Rigell Doesn’t.

Today marks the 60 day anniversary of US Congressman Scott Rigell’s lie to me about responding to my concerns about CAIR being allowed to operate in Virginia. Rigell stood at his Town Hall meeting on 8 April 15 at Regency University Law School and went on and on and on about his passion for responding to constituents’ concerns, especially the written variety, like my letter from December 2014 expressing my concerns about CAIR. It turns out that performance was all for show in front of 200+ voters. Rigell lied to all of us, plain and simple.

Presidential hopeful George Pataki seems to “get it” when it comes to CAIR. Sadly, US Congressman Rigell does not. What will it take for Rigell to respond to my original registered letter of six months ago? Will CAIR have to be named as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a terror trial? A federal judge already did that. Will CAIR have to be named as a terror organization by the UAE? Oops! The UAE already did that. Will one of CAIR’s top men in Florida have to be arrested for attempting to have sex with a 12 year old girl? Yes, that happened last week.

Will George Pataki’s declaration cause Rigell to come out from hiding under his desk and take CAIR on or at least give us an explanation why he won’t.

I’m afraid that you’ll have to ask Rigell for the answer to that question.

Apparently, he feels like he doesn’t answer to me. Maybe you can get an answer.

John P. Kuchta, Jr.
Virginia Beach, VA

CAIR’s Tax-Exempt Status Should Be Stripped: Pataki
Posted on June 6, 2015 by lburt

CAIR’s National Communications Director and spokesperson Ibrahim Hooper (L) with Executive Director and Founder Nihad Awad

Clarion Project, by Ryan Mauro, June 4, 2015:
Republican presidential candidate and former New York Governor George Pataki would strip the tax-exempt status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and designated terrorist group by the United Arab Emirates, he told the Clarion Project.

“That’s just one of the organizations I have in mind,” Pataki answered regarding his proposal to strip the tax-exempt status of radical organizations and whether he had any thoughts on CAIR.

Pataki, who was the Governor of New York during the 9/11 attacks, has stated that the federal government needs to be able to prosecute those who use free speech protections to promote terrorist organizations and incite violence against Americans.

“We respect the First Amendment but anybody who promotes recruitment to any terrorist organization, anybody who incites their fellow Americans to violence against Americans should be arrested, prosecuted and convicted. And any organization, whether it’s an Internet site they are using or a mosque or a church, should lose its tax-exempt status,” Pataki said.

Pataki was presumably aware that CAIR was designated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation, a Muslim Brotherhood front whose leaders were found guilty of financing Hamas. CAIR was listed by federal prosecutors as an “entity” of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, a secret body that was established to support Hamas and advance the Islamist cause.

In another court case in 2007, federal prosecutors stated in a court filing:
“From its founding by Muslim Brotherhood leaders, CAIR conspired with other affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood to support terrorists … the conspirators agreed to use deception to conceal from the American public their connections to terrorists.”

In 1993, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad said, “I am in support of the Hamas movement more than the PLO.” In 2004, he refused to condemn Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups in an Arabic interview with Al-Jazeera. Instead, he called them “liberation movements.” His emails were monitored by the FBI from July 2006 until at least February 2008.

The FBI stopped using CAIR as an outreach partner in 2008, stating, “until we can resolve whether there continues to be a relationship between CAIR or its executives with Hamas, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner.”
The Justice Department also instructed FBI field offices to stop using CAIR as a liaison for the Muslim community in order to “ensure that the FBI is not supporting individuals who support extremist or terrorist ideologies.”

In November 2014, the Muslim government of the United Arab Emirates banned CAIR as a terrorist group, even though it was previously friendly towards the group. Senior UAE officials defended the decision.

A senior UAE official said the objective is “to cut off access to all forms of material and moral support for terrorism, to drain its resources, to prevent the incitement of terrorist crimes, to prevent the praising of terrorism and to work to stop the spreading of such crimes or any encouragement of the committing of them.”

The Clarion Project’s documented profile of CAIR can be read here.

Our factsheet regarding Governor Pataki’s stances on Islamist extremism can be read here. We have published similar factsheets for all declared presidential candidates

Scott Rigell Ignores CAIR Problem!

For one half year, I have been attempting to get a response from Scott Rigell, US Congressman from Virginia’s Second Congressional District on a matter of national security.

I first wrote Rigell a registered letter in early December 2014, asking him why CAIR members were allowed to roam freely about our state. Rigell never answered that letter and he lied to me at his Town Hall meeting when I asked him in front of 200+ witnesses why he had not responded to my letter.

Besides the fact that CAIR was named as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the HLF terror trial and was also designated as a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates in November 2014, CAIR continues to operate out of their headquarters building in DC. Their members live in VA. As if that wasn’t sufficiently bad press to warrant a response from Rigell, now comes word that one of CAIR’s management team has been arrested in a child sex sting operation in Florida. We want to encourage folks of this ilk to live in our state, don’t we?
.

http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/leader-of-pro-islam-group-in-florida-arrested-for-sex-with-children/

Rigell lied to me in front of 200 people.

What will it take for him to respond to an organization of Muslim jihadists who prey on little kids operating in our region?

What about it, Mr. Rigell?

CAIR Destroying American Values!

My US Congressman, Scott Rigell, continues his silence regarding Islamic jihad organizations like CAIR, headquartered across the river from VA in DC. Many CAIR members live in Virginia; but, Congressman Rigell apparently sees no problem with such anti-US organizations. CAIR’s latest proclamations denigrating America’s fighting men and women on Memorial Day (below) should be sufficient evidence to even our left-leaning voters that the congressman has a huge problem.

Is the congressman obligated to CAIR in some way? Why would he not respond to my letters and why would he not uphold his promise to respond to me made in front of 200+ voters at his Town Hall meeting on 8 April 15?

Does Congressman Rigell know something that we don’t know?

Is there something about Rigell that I just don’t get?

I will continue to call him a liar until he responds to me.

John P. Kuchta, Jr.
Virginia Beach, VA

Hamas-linked CAIR questions if US troops should be honored on Memorial Day

May 26, 2015 4:47 am By Robert Spencer 38 Comments

Traitors in our midst, lauded as a “civil rights organization” by the mainstream media. Hamas-linked CAIR, designated a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates, was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror . CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements . Zahra Billoo leads its California chapter that distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI. CAIR has opposed every anti-terror measure that has ever been proposed or implemented. It has itself been labeled a terror group by the United Arab Emirates.

“CAIR: Muslim Organization Questions if US Troops Should be Honored on Memorial Day,” Girls Just Wanna Have Guns, May 25, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
zahro billoo

Virtually all Americans come together on Memorial Day to honor those who paid the ultimate sacrifice for the country’s freedom and safety. Two Council on American-Islamic Relations’ officials spent the holiday weekend differently: Questioning whether U.S. troops deserve to be honored and tweeting that the country was “established upon white supremacy.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group labeled by the Justice Department as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity andunindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism-financing trial, disingenuously claims that it is a moderate organization.

Yet, on May 23, Zahra Billoo, the radical executive-director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter, tweeted that she “struggles with Memorial Day each year” about whether to honor American soldiers who died in wars:

She also quoted another CAIR official, Dawud Walid, the executive-director of CAIR’s Michigan chapter, as questioning whether they should honor American soldiers that died in “unjust” wars and occupations.

That’s a direct insult to American soldiers currently serving in Afghanistan and those that have returned from Iraq, as CAIR officials consistently describe those wars with that terminology. Billoo quoted Walid as saying:

Billoo did, however, find one “soldier” she felt comfortably honoring. On May 26, she promoted an article from the anti-Semitic and anti-American Nation of Islam that asked for help for a “black liberation soldier” named Imam Jamil al-Amin:

Al-Amin was a member of the Black Panthers terrorist group and was convicted of murdering a police officer in 2000. He is also anti-American, stating “if America doesn’t come around, we’re gonna burn it down,” and “ I say violence is necessary. It is as American as cherry pie.”

Al-Amin also said, “When we begin to look critically at the Constitution of the United States . . . we see that in its main essence it is diametrically opposed to what Allah has commanded.”…

A Great Memorial Day Weekend Read!

It should be fairly apparent to anybody paying attention that there is something dramatically wrong when the mightiest military on Earth is made to seem incapable of defeating a fledgling fighting force like ISIS. From the early days of 2014 when Obama referred to ISIS as a “JV Team,” to this past weekend when ISIS took Ramadi, the capital of Anbar Province, located just 70 miles from Baghdad, we realize that we are no longer isolated by an ocean from the turmoil in Africa. An ISIS assassination team recently emerged from their vehicle in Garland, TX, in full body armor with AK 47′s blazing. Luckily, we witnessed expert marksmanship from a Garland traffic cop thwarting that attack. But, the attack proves that jihadists are plotting against us and my exhortations to “raid the US mosques” continue to be ignored by Obama and his treasonous minions as he actively plots to allow ISIS to grow more effective, both abroad and here in the homeland. Robert Spencer, the author of the essay below and the daily newsletter “Jihad Watch,” does an excellent job of pointing out the obvious Obama plan to allow the ISIS cancer to grow.

Obama’s withdrawal into the condition that he calls “leading from behind” has pushed the Prime Minister of Iraq, Haidar al-Abadi, into the embrace of the Russians. The Iraqi Premier was in Moscow just last week and Putin was all too happy to offer ” military and other aid” to help Iraq defeat ISIS. You heard all about that trip in our MSM, didn’t you? You didn’t? I wonder why? Al-Abadi was quoted that he had disregarded “certain forces” advising him to cancel his trip to Moscow. Translation: Screw you, Mr. Obama!

I have no love for Mr. Putin, but, he loves his country and has plans to elevate “Mother Russia” to the top spot in the Middle East and the world. What exactly are Mr. Obama’s plans for the United States of America? Obama seems to be indicating that, “We’re Number One!”

Oops! Wrong finger.

John P. Kuchta, Jr., VB, VA

Obama’s Policies to Empower ISIS Exposed

by Raymond Ibrahim on May 21, 2015 in Other Matters

In an article published over seven months ago, I anticipated the main developments to have taken place since U.S. President Obama declared war (i.e., “airstrikes”) on the Islamic State in September, 2014. Titled “ Does Obama Need ‘Time to Defeat or Forget ISIS?” I made the following predictions, all of which have come true, and in the same sequence:

Obama’s “it will take time” [to defeat IS] assertion prompts the following prediction: U.S. airstrikes on IS targets will continue to be just enough to pacify those calling for action against the caliphate (“we’re doing what we can”). The official [U.S. government’s] narrative will be that the Islamic State is gradually being weakened, that victory is a matter of time (remember, “It will take time”)….

[W]e will hear about the occasional victory against IS—this or that leader killed or captured…

Then, just as they “suddenly” appeared in Iraq, we will “suddenly” again hear—probably first from IS itself—that the Islamic State has made some major comeback, winning over some new piece of territory, as the caliphate continues to grow and get stronger.

Now consider how the Obama administration’s actions have fulfilled these predictions, and often in the same sequence.

The official [U.S. government’s] narrative will be that the Islamic State is gradually being weakened, that victory is a matter of time…

Last February, key Obama administration figures—including Secretary of State John Kerry and retired General John Allen, the president’s special coordinator for the coalition against the Islamic State—triumphantly asserted that, thanks to U.S. airstrikes, “half the group’s [IS] leaders in Iraq had been killed.”

Not long thereafter, an investigative report demonstrated that such claims were utterly falseand hardly representative of reality.

[W]e will hear about the occasional victory against IS…

In April, the Pentagon announced that, thanks to U.S. airstrikes and the Iraqi army, “ISIL [Islamic State] is no longer the dominant force in roughly 25 to 30% of the populated areas of Iraqi territory where it once had complete freedom of movement.” The Pentagon even released a map showing which territories the Islamic State had lost.

Soon, however, it became evident that the Pentagon’s claim and map were misleading and incomplete. Among other irregularities, the map, while showing territories that IS once held and territories it had since lost, failed to indicate the new territories IS had gained since the coalition effort began—making the 25%-30% claim totally misleading.

[W]e will hear about … this or that leader killed or captured…

Nor was Obama administration grandstanding concerning the killing of “key” IS figures wanting. Most recently, on May 16, U.S. special forces managed to kill Abu Sayyaf. Although only a mid-ranking leader, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said his killing “ represents another significant blow to Isis.” ( Read here for an idea of how many times U.S. officials have made the “significant blow” assertion whenever this or that jihadi dies, only for the jihad to spread and conquer more lands.)

Even the New York Times observed that “Abu Sayyaf is a midlevel leader in the organization — one terrorism analyst compared him to Al Capone’s accountant — and likely is replaceable in fairly short order.”

Then, just as they “suddenly” appeared in Iraq, we will “suddenly” again hear—probably first from IS itself—that the Islamic State has made some major comeback, winning over some new piece of territory, as the caliphate continues to grow and get stronger.

Finally, after the Obama administration had claimed that it had killed half of IS leadership, that it had pushed IS out of 25%-30% previously held territory, that its killing of an IS midlevel leader was a “significant blow”—right on cue, the Islamic State just announced its takeover of Ramadi, the capital of Anbar, one of Iraq’s most strategic provinces. According to a May 17 Reuters report:

Islamic State militants said they had taken full control of the western Iraqi city of Ramadi on Sunday in the biggest defeat for the Baghdad government since last summer.

It was the biggest victory for Islamic State in Iraq since security forces and Shi’ite paramilitary groups began pushing the militants back last year, aided by air strikes from a U.S.-led coalition.

The U.S. Defense Department, while not confirming the fall of Ramadi, sought to play down the impact on the broader Iraq military campaign of an Islamic State seizure of the city.

To fully appreciate the significance of this latest conquest by the Islamic State, consider the words of Anbar governor Ahmed al-Dulaimi spoken back in November 2014: “If we lose Anbar, that means we will lose Iraq.”

Of course, none of these developments are surprising for those among us who were able to take a step back—to transcend the distracting noise and nonsense daily gr ound- out by mainstream media—and look at the big picture.

For those able to read the plain writing on the wall, the end game between Obama and the Islamic State was always easy to discern.