In his January 2016, State of Disunion address, Barack Obama said this:
“As Americans, we respect human dignity, even when we’re threatened, which is why I’ve prohibited torture, and worked to make sure our use of new technology like drones is properly constrained. It’s why we speak out against the deplorable anti-Semitism that has resurfaced in certain parts of the world. It’s why we continue to reject offensive stereotypes of Muslims — the vast majority of whom share our commitment to peace. That’s why we defend free speech, and advocate for political prisoners, and condemn the persecution of women, or religious minorities, or people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. We do these things not only because they’re right, but because they make us safer.”
Fair deal, Barack or Barry or whatever name you’re using these days, how does your glowing statement above explain why Major Nidal Hasan has not been executed for murdering 13 heroes while he screamed “Allahu Akbar” from a table top at Fort Hood ? Why did the FBI do nothing when they found out that Hasan was emailing a Muslim Imam in Yemen known to be a radical jihadist? It’s been over five years, Barry! Hang the murderer, Barry! Do I have to spell it out for you? Maybe I do: H-A-N-G H-I-M.
And, Barry, why did you tell Eric “Fast and Furious” Holder not to indict any of the 200+ “unindicted co-conspirators” named by federal Judge Jorge Solis in the aftermath of the Holy Land Foundation terror trial? I know that you supposedly graduated from Harvard Law (even though your transcripts were sealed by high profile lawyers), but let me explain what Judge Solis’ list means in this context. Judge Solis was essentially saying to your Department of Justice that he had heard substantial wiretap evidence and testimony by FBI agents to convince him that if the named co-conspirators were brought to trial on terrorism charges before his bench, chances were great that the conspirators would be found guilty of terror-related charges. Nothing happened, why?
Please note that the list contains such notable Muslim organizations such as CAIR, ISNA and NAIT, darlings of the Obama administration. Obama staffers have met with CAIR representatives over 125 times since the start of his administration. Did the Obamaites back away when the United Arab Emirates named CAIR a terror organization in November 2014? Not on your life! In fact, They doubled-down by making a formal request for the UAE to explain why CAIR was put on their list of terror organizations.
Wow! All that Saudi campaign cash works wonders in the Obama universe, don’t it?
Why does the DoJ have the resources and manpower to pursue a civil rights investigation that proved futile in the matter of Officer Wilson from Ferguson, MO, in the attempted arrest of Michael Brown; but, the same Holder-led DoJ doesn’t seem interested in pursuing what could amount to several hundred or even several thousand possible Muslim terrorists, despite Judge Solis’ warning?
Barry, the average American is NOT “stereotyping Muslims,” we’re wanting justice for slain Americans and we want to prevent further Muslim Jihad attacks.
By the way, how many Muslim terrorists have hung for killing our ambassador to Libya?
On the VERY DAY that we moved two US Navy war ships into position to evacuate our State Department personnel out of Yemen, we are reminded why our Liar-in-Chief did not attend the rally in Paris after the attack on the Charlie Hebdo paper. His non-attendance at the rally was obviously tuned to coincide with Obama NOT MENTIONING Al Qaeda in his State of the Union speech. What is remarkable about this omission is that Al Qaeda in Yemen claimed total credit for the attack on the Parisian paper:
In Obama’s universe, if you ignore a topic, it doesn’t exist. Obama is child like in his outlook except that he is a committed Marxist / Socialist who couldn’t be bothered with the welfare of Americans of any stripe.
Another major development that took place on the day of Obama’s speech was the historic, some say biblical, treaty between Russia and Iran, uniting the two countries in an arms alliance. Both countries called the pact a response to US “interference” in the region. Is Obama worried? Heck no, he’s got his bunker all squared away. The word is that the progress on the underground golf course is steady with the front nine “playable” and real progress being made on the back nine.
The atmosphere of lies is incredible: Obama says that he’s beating terrorists but he won’t raid the US mosques where the plots against our Republic are planned. Does everyone remember that Obama’s spending bill, submitted just weeks ago actually contained ONE HALF BILLION dollars for ISIS-linked Syrian rebels? In case that’s slipped you mind, here’s the link:
Obama took credit last night for increased US oil and gas production, but he failed to mention that he has closed mineral exploration on federal lands. Obama conveniently failed to mention that his agreement with the Saudis to engineer a price collapse in the price of oil will see our oil production figures wither with lower prices. And, why does Obama agree with the Saudi plan to collapse oil prices? The Saudis want to kick Putin in the teeth and drive Russia from Syria.to enable the Saudis to lay oil and gas pipelines across Syria to Europe. The conflict in Syria is all about future European market share, plain and simple. Obama owes the Saudis big time for all the campaign cash that the Saudis pump into the US political system. When both Russia and Iran support Syria’s Bashar al Assad, any military agreement between these countries should be viewed with alarm, unless of course you view a global conflict as a good thing. Don’t laugh. One segment of the Shiites in Iran believe that the world must be set ablaze to light the path for the return of the Twelfth Imam. Remember Ahmadinajhad? He was a “Twelver.”
Obama is ready to give away child care, community college tuition and paid sick leave, but failed to mention that he has doubled the national debt to $18 trillion and growing steadily. The price of gold is climbing steadily each day as realists see our monumental debt and global war a real probability. So, how’s you bunker looking?
If you are a Muslim in America, Garland, TX, was the place to be this past Saturday night, 17 Jan 15. A big Muslim rally was held in the Curtis Caldwell center which is owned by the Garland Independent School District.
Funny thing, the rally was held on public property, school property no less, but the non-Muslim media was barred from entering the Center. Notable interviewers like Jesse Waters from Fox’s Bill O’Reilly Show flew to TX to record the event after having pre-registered. Multiple advances to gain access to the event by Waters were rebuffed by representatives of the show organizers and by local police. I guess that you have to be Muslim to be guaranteed freedom of the press in America in 2015?
At any rate, the event should have been a success at many levels. It was a target-rich environment for undercover FBI and DHS types who should have been filming the crowds outside the event. Hot-headed, jihadist Muslims couldn’t have passed-up a gig like this if they tried. There were plenty of Texans on hand to shout at and some Muslims even crossed the street to get in the face of some of the gringos. I guess that because it was school property that nobody was allowed to conceal carry? Probably a good thing.
Any good photographer could have easily captured the photo of everybody who was entering the center to attend the rally and the Muslim protestors outside the Center. Did anyone get those photos? I think that Eric Holder may be the only man who may be able to answer that question and he’s not talking to me since I accused him of blatant corruption on the fbi.gov web site. That’s too bad since I could make so many helpful suggestions to Eric if he would just listen; but, I’m banned from the site and I actually brag about that fact at bar-b-q’s and barber shops to folks who are interested. Being banned by the Obama / Holder DoJ is a badge of honor that I wear with distinction.
Let’s take my suggestion of a photo gallery just a step further. How many Muslim “plants” did the DoJ and DHS have in attendance to record the multiple treasons taking place against America by the illustrious guest speakers? Would that be a half dozen, two, one or none? I’ll just bet that a majority of you guessed none and you’re probably correct! And, man-oh-man, did they have some treasonous s.o.b.’s on the speakers docket. Take the NY Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an “unindicted co-conspirator” from the trial of the Blind Sheik for bombing the World Trade Center back in 1993. Yep, you know that a recorder could have captured some pearls spilling from his lips.
This is how bad Holder has made it for the FBI tracking terror suspects. If an FBI has a suspect under surveillance on a city street and the suspect is headed in the general direction of a mosque, the FBI agent must withdraw his observations, both his own eye witness and any recording equipment. Man, I could be mistaken, but does that sound like a sure-‘nuf “War on Terror” to you? That sounds pretty pathetic to me. So what do all these agencies spend all that taxpayer money on? Is the budget used to fund big salaries and retirement benefits, health care coverage second to none and fancy surveillance equipment that the FBI is allowed to use to record Tea Party rallies. Oh, yes, the restrictions on surveillance techniques don’t apply to conservatives. I guess that goes double for one of the most corrupt federal agencies, the IRS.
While all this was happening in Garland, Texas, Mr. Obama didn’t comment on the 13 children hung by ISIS in Mosel, Iraq, for watching a soccer game on television. How would Obama spin that massacre, play space violence?
No, ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Barry Soetoro is keeping the channels of communication wide open to his Muslim brethren while he makes his run at the position of Secretary General of the UN. Believe me when I tell you that Obama’s quest for that position is progressing along nicely. Obama has amassed quite a resume’: Born in the third world country of Kenya, IL State Senator, US Senator from IL, Nobel Peace Prize recipient and finally the worst President in US history. Sounds like a guy tailor-made for the UN, doesn’t it? And what will be Obama’s ultimate goal as UN Secretary General? Take a guess! Will it be to enact binding legislation at the UN to further stifle American business, to take away our guns and ultimately our right to free speech and the vote? If you guessed all of the above you’re firing on all cylinders this morning.
Once Obama’s eight years of ruining our healthcare system, our economy, our military and our international standing are over, he can just move to the UN to continue his fight against America; and, dear taxpayers, you will still be funding his Hawaiian vacations, his healthcare, his pension, his library and his Secret Service protection for the rest of his miserable life. You’ll also get to hear from his political base what a wonderful job he did as President and at the UN as they March down the streets of Ferguson, MO, or whichever city is unfortunate enough to host the next riots.
Yep, Obama is going to totally transform the United States of America for decades to come and we’re paying him to do it.
I read the following article in “Jihad Watch” the first time, then I had to read it a second time.
Our Marxist / Socialist-in-Chief looks like he wants a bare knuckles fight pretty dad-gum soon by the way his rhetoric has ratcheted-up.
He says that he wants to curtail our anti-Muslim Jihad writing because it leads to Muslim jihad terror attacks?
Nice try, Muslim guy, but I ain’t buying and I doubt anybody on this distribution will either.
I get it, Mr. President. You may come-out as a Sunni Muslim well before the January 2017 timetable that I’ve forecast.
That’s OK, I made a mistake before. It was in 1970. That incident still bugs me.
John P. Kuchta, Jr.
Virginia Beach, VA
White House: Obama will fight media to stop anti-jihad articles
January 13, 2015 4:39 pm By Robert Spencer 76 Comments
ObamaMore self-censorship and voluntary acceptance of Sharia blasphemy laws. The President of the United States is now (again) signaling that terrorism works: he is saying he will act to curtail Americans’ freedom of expression because Muslims are committing mass murder in response of the freedom of expression. He could have said that he would defend those who say things that jihadis dislike from violent attacks, but no. He was as consistent as ever. And the freedom of speech will suffer for it. How long before he shuts down Jihad Watch, to appease our jihadi brethren?
“White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles,” by Neil Munro, Daily Caller, January 13, 2015:
President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.
“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.
The unprecedented reversal of Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.
The White House voiced its objections in 2012 after the magazine’s office were burned by jihadis, followings its publication of anti-jihadi cartoons.
Earnest’s defense of tho 2012 objections came just five days after the magazine’s office was attacked by additional jihadis. Eight journalists, two policeman and a visitor were murdered by two French-born Muslims who objected to the magazine’s criticism of Islam’s final prophet.
In 2012, “there was a genuine concern that the publication of some of those materials could put Americans abroad at risk, including American soldiers at risk,” Earnest said.
“That is something that the commander in chief takes very seriously,” he added, before saying that “the president and his spokesman was not then and will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform.”
In December, Congress approved and the president signed a $585 billion defense budget to train and equip soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen to defend Americans — including journalists — from foreign threats. The nation’s media industry does not have a defense budget to protect soldiers.
Earnest tried to rationalize the president’s opposition to the publication of anti-jihadist materials as a moral duty.
Whenever journalists consider publishing materials disliked by jihadis, “I think there are a couple of absolutes,” he told the reporters.
The first is “that the publication of any kind of material in no way justifies any act of violence, let alone an act of violence that we saw on the scale in Paris,” he said.
The second absolute is the president’s duty to lobby editors and reporters against publishing anti-jihadi information, he said. ”And there is — this president, as the commander in chief, believes strongly in the responsibility that he has to advocate for our men and women in uniform, particularly if it’s going to make them safer,” Earnest said.
He repeated the two-fisted formulation a moment later. ”What won’t change is our view that that freedom of expression in no way justifies an act of violence against the person who expressed a view. And the president considers the safety and security of our men and women in uniform to be something worth fighting for,” he said.
Throughout the press conference, Earnest repeatedly said the media would be able to decide on its own whether to publish pictures, articles or facts that could prompt another murderous jihad attack by Muslim against journalists.
But he did not say that his government has a constitutional and moral duty to use the nation’s huge military to protect journalists from armed jihadis, but instead hinted strongly that journalists should submit to jihadi threats.
“I think that there are any number of reasons that [U.S.] media organizations have made a decision not to reprint the cartoons” after the January attack, he said. “In some cases, maybe they were concerned about their physical safety. In other cases, they were exercising some judgment in a different way. So we certainly would leave it to media organizations to make a decision like this.”
“What I’m saying is that individual news organizations have to assess that risk for themselves,” he said. “I think the point in the mind of the president and certainly everybody here at the White House is that that is a question that should be answered by journalists.”
“I’m confident in saying that for the vast majority of media organizations, that [fear is] not the only factor. But I would readily concede that it is one in the minds of many of those news executives. But again, that is a decision for all of them to make,” he said